Cornell University Home Page

List of Figures

The list of figures in "Bidirectional Decision Feedback Equalization and MIMO Channel Training," a Ph.D thesis by Jaiganesh Balakrishnan, are tabulated here.

2.11 MSE performance curves for an asymmetric channel with an impulse response c_1 = [0.183 0.916 0.289 -0.183 0.092 -0.046 0.018].
2.12 SER performance curves for an asymmetric channel with an impulse response c_1 = [0.183 0.916 0.289 -0.183 0.092 -0.046 0.018].
2.13 SER performance comparison with MLSE for an asymmetric channel with an impulse response c_1 = [0.183 0.916 0.289 -0.183 0.092 -0.046 0.018].
2.14 MSE performance curves for a symmetric channel with an impulse response c_2 = [0.2887 0.9129 0.2887].
2.15 SER performance curves for a symmetric channel with an impulse response c_2 = [0.2887 0.9129 0.2887].
2.16 Performance of a Bidirectional Arbitrated DFE (BAD) for a symmetric channel with an impulse response c_2 = [0.2887 0.9129 0.2887].
2.17 Comparative MSE performance with same total number of taps for a BiDFE and a DFE.
2.18 Effect of channel estimation on SER performance for an asymmetric channel with an impulse response of c_1 = [0.183 0.916 0.289 -0.183 0.092 -0.046 0.018].
3.2 Performance gap from the matched filter bound for a symmetric 3-tap channel with root locations at (beta, 1/beta).
3.3 Performance gap from the matched filter bound for an asymmetric 3-tap channel with root locations at (beta, 1/2).
4.1 MSE performance of a finite length MMSE-BiDFE
4.2 SER performance of a finite length MMSE-BiDFE
4.3 SER performance of a finite length "modified" MMSE-BiDFE
4.5 SER performance of an iterative finite length LC-BiDFE
5.3 MSE performance of user 1 for the MIMO test channel C with M=2, P=2
5.4 MSE performance of user 2 for the MIMO test channel C with M=2, P=2
5.5 SER performance of user 1 for the MIMO test channel C with M=2, P=2
5.6 SER performance of user 2 for the MIMO test channel C with M=2, P=2
A.2 SER performance for a fading channel environment
A.3 SER performance comparison for a few sample channels with the urban power profile
A.4 SER performance comparison for a deep null channel c_3 = [-0.3920 0.0152 0.8320 0.0152 -0.3920]
A.5 SER performance comparison for an iterated LC-BiDFE for the channel c_4 = [-0.2053 0.1300 0.9391 0.1300 -0.2053]
B.1 Loss due to channel estimation, M=2
B.2 Loss due to channel estimation, M=4